The first document is a straightforward refusal to comply, Deliberately misquoting the RECOMMENDATIONS narrative of my psychological evaluation and citing their own "Practice Guidelines" as justification for doing so. "SCF acknowledges that Judge Mendiguren recommended that you be referred to "anger management services". However....In domestic violence cases, perpetrators should be refer(red) to a batterers intervention program that addressess power and control issues, not anger management". Refusal to comply with a supeona for records begins on page 1  We requested all correspondence from SCF to Dr. Starr and any response from Dr. Starr This request was denied by Elizabeth Clark-Stern stating "we do not believe it is in the best interests of the parties involved to release this." We did petition the court for an in camera review of the documents, but SCF selectively refused to provide the   incriminating correspondence we were seeking. To view my psychological evaluation click HERE

The Citizens Review Board found that reasonable efforts were not made

Defiance of the Judges recommendations

Page  Main  1 2 3 4

This portion of the letter
and the phone call from
Dr. Starr clearing me of
sexual misconduct that
prompted us to issue
the supeona for my
psychological
evaluation  which was
selectively denied

Court Orders/Supeonas

Main Page

Here is the actual text
from my evaluation:
"The best way to engage
Mr. Bare in a cooperative
endeavor is to find a way
to pace him and
acknowledge his point
of view...He is not likely
to benefit from
psychotherapeutic
intervention if it's not his
idea"