Brookbank Perjury #1
Ms. Brookbank:   "Yes, the first phone call that we had was when Mr. Bare was at the jail and Stephanie
was at the home. My understanding is that, at a hearing that Mr. Bare was asked, it came to the Court's
attention, I'm not sure if it was you or Judge Valentine, that there was a minor child in the home and an
effort was made by the Court to identify extended family members for Stephanie so that she wouldn't be
left alone in the home and my understanding --again I wasn't there-- was that Mr. Bare indicated that
there was no, I think there was no extended --no available extended family members and I don't know if
that meant that he was saying there was no one in town or that, as I understand from him that there's
not contact with those family members. And so we sent out a co-worker and I went out to see
Stephanie in the home. She was home by herself."

This false statement is repeated in a document (
147A):

"At the time of referral by Deputy Roger Washbond, custodial parent Larry Bare was lodged in Union
County jail and twelve year old Stephanie was alone in the family's rental home on East "N" Avenue in
La Grande.  At arraignment, Mr. Bare refused temporary placement of his daughter with local extended
family members: the court reportedly allowed her to remian in the home alone."
Perjured testimony by Ms Brookbank explaining why they went to our home despite my specific
instructions not to.
In a nutshell, there was no such hearing, this can be verified by public Court records. She lied to cover up the fact that she was
waiting for this call from the jail to take my daughter. This attempt was foiled by the appearance of  our families best friends with
two girls of their own who took Stephanie for the night. This family friend later demonized and lied about in Court - perjury #2
Jean Brookbank uses
"you or Judge Valentine" and "
"an effort...made by the Court"
to give her lies credibility. It is
a technique repeated in her
other serious perjury